<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IEEE Information Theory Society limits the size of correspondences</title>
	<link>http://windowsil.org/2007/01/31/ieee-information-theory-society-limits-the-size-of-correspondences/</link>
	<description>Your window into the Wireless Systems Innovation Laboratory</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 13:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Robert Heath</title>
		<link>http://windowsil.org/2007/01/31/ieee-information-theory-society-limits-the-size-of-correspondences/#comment-1770</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 17:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://windowsil.org/2007/01/31/ieee-information-theory-society-limits-the-size-of-correspondences/#comment-1770</guid>
					<description>I don't agree. The percentage of IT papers is much higher than other journals. That's about all you can say. I don't think the quality is higher and I don't think the acceptance rate is lower than other journals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t agree. The percentage of IT papers is much higher than other journals. That&#8217;s about all you can say. I don&#8217;t think the quality is higher and I don&#8217;t think the acceptance rate is lower than other journals.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rahul Vaze</title>
		<link>http://windowsil.org/2007/01/31/ieee-information-theory-society-limits-the-size-of-correspondences/#comment-1433</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 04:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://windowsil.org/2007/01/31/ieee-information-theory-society-limits-the-size-of-correspondences/#comment-1433</guid>
					<description>Robert,
 I agree that the Trans IT is very specific, but the point is that the percentage of &quot;good&quot; papers is much higher in IT than any other journal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert,<br />
 I agree that the Trans IT is very specific, but the point is that the percentage of &#8220;good&#8221; papers is much higher in IT than any other journal.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Robert Heath</title>
		<link>http://windowsil.org/2007/01/31/ieee-information-theory-society-limits-the-size-of-correspondences/#comment-1353</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 05:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://windowsil.org/2007/01/31/ieee-information-theory-society-limits-the-size-of-correspondences/#comment-1353</guid>
					<description>Rahul, unfortunately IT only caters to certain kinds of results.  It may be the best place for a paper on space-time coding but probably not for a paper on channel estimation or synchronization. It really depends on the topic. I don't think the review process is much different, besides being a lot slower.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rahul, unfortunately IT only caters to certain kinds of results.  It may be the best place for a paper on space-time coding but probably not for a paper on channel estimation or synchronization. It really depends on the topic. I don&#8217;t think the review process is much different, besides being a lot slower.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rahul Vaze</title>
		<link>http://windowsil.org/2007/01/31/ieee-information-theory-society-limits-the-size-of-correspondences/#comment-1218</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 04:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://windowsil.org/2007/01/31/ieee-information-theory-society-limits-the-size-of-correspondences/#comment-1218</guid>
					<description>Bob: Well accept it or not IT is the best journal in the business related to our area. 
Robert: I would be glad to see if thats gonna happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob: Well accept it or not IT is the best journal in the business related to our area.<br />
Robert: I would be glad to see if thats gonna happen.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Robert Heath</title>
		<link>http://windowsil.org/2007/01/31/ieee-information-theory-society-limits-the-size-of-correspondences/#comment-1081</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 03:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://windowsil.org/2007/01/31/ieee-information-theory-society-limits-the-size-of-correspondences/#comment-1081</guid>
					<description>Bob - last I checked students often vacation in exotic locations as well. 

Rahul - I think the reason (at least I hope) is to force IT to accept more papers as regular papers. I think there is a lot of value to many correspondences but they are viewed as second class citizens because the end up on the back page. It seems political to me. Hopefully the net result will be a higher regular paper acceptance rate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob - last I checked students often vacation in exotic locations as well. </p>
<p>Rahul - I think the reason (at least I hope) is to force IT to accept more papers as regular papers. I think there is a lot of value to many correspondences but they are viewed as second class citizens because the end up on the back page. It seems political to me. Hopefully the net result will be a higher regular paper acceptance rate.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bob Daniels</title>
		<link>http://windowsil.org/2007/01/31/ieee-information-theory-society-limits-the-size-of-correspondences/#comment-1050</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 00:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://windowsil.org/2007/01/31/ieee-information-theory-society-limits-the-size-of-correspondences/#comment-1050</guid>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;A better idea would have been to do away with correspondences altogether and increase the acceptance rate in ISIT.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I agree…that way more professors get to vacation in exotic locations all on research dollars!
&lt;blockquote&gt;I really dont see a merit in this decision...&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Is there really any merit to any IT publication? :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>A better idea would have been to do away with correspondences altogether and increase the acceptance rate in ISIT.</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree…that way more professors get to vacation in exotic locations all on research dollars!</p>
<blockquote><p>I really dont see a merit in this decision&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Is there really any merit to any IT publication? :P
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

