<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3G is finally here</title>
	<link>http://windowsil.org/2007/10/11/3g-is-finally-here/</link>
	<description>Your window into the Wireless Systems Innovation Laboratory</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 13:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Steven Peters</title>
		<link>http://windowsil.org/2007/10/11/3g-is-finally-here/#comment-19792</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://windowsil.org/2007/10/11/3g-is-finally-here/#comment-19792</guid>
					<description>Wow, I actually wrote &quot;callet&quot; instead of &quot;call it&quot;.  The engineering side of my brain is slowly taking over the rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I actually wrote &#8220;callet&#8221; instead of &#8220;call it&#8221;.  The engineering side of my brain is slowly taking over the rest.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Steven Peters</title>
		<link>http://windowsil.org/2007/10/11/3g-is-finally-here/#comment-19791</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://windowsil.org/2007/10/11/3g-is-finally-here/#comment-19791</guid>
					<description>Well, between 3G and 2G there is a 50% G increase.  Between 3G and 4G there is a 33% G increase, and so on.  Eventually consumers will get leary of having so many G's.

Marketing people will eventually just callet LG, Last Generation.  And the one after that will be Super LG, and finally STITLG (Seriously, This Is The Last Generation).  

Although I'm surprised how much marketers use engineering terms, like people know what they mean.  CDMA, MIMO, etc.  I guess it's sexy to have confusing buzzwords on your box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, between 3G and 2G there is a 50% G increase.  Between 3G and 4G there is a 33% G increase, and so on.  Eventually consumers will get leary of having so many G&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Marketing people will eventually just callet LG, Last Generation.  And the one after that will be Super LG, and finally STITLG (Seriously, This Is The Last Generation).  </p>
<p>Although I&#8217;m surprised how much marketers use engineering terms, like people know what they mean.  CDMA, MIMO, etc.  I guess it&#8217;s sexy to have confusing buzzwords on your box.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Robert Heath</title>
		<link>http://windowsil.org/2007/10/11/3g-is-finally-here/#comment-19750</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 05:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://windowsil.org/2007/10/11/3g-is-finally-here/#comment-19750</guid>
					<description>Well, I was trying not to disclose the manufacturer of my device but, let me say, it is indeed HTC. They make phones for a lot of people - it doesn't surprise me that google is jumping on. I had the experience of using google maps with the built in GPS for the first time. Cool! 

Bob - 2.5G vs. 3G for a GSM device is easy since 3G supports CDMA whereas 2.5G just GMSK based TDMA (for voice) and the addition of EDGE with 8-PSK for data. 

Steve - We get a new G about every 10 years. So you are about right, something like 25G would be appropriate. Not sure it is incremental. System spectral efficiency is certainly increasing by more than 4% - which is the real sell to service providers. For us though, 2G voice versus 3G voice, honestly can't tell the difference. The data rate is higher though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I was trying not to disclose the manufacturer of my device but, let me say, it is indeed HTC. They make phones for a lot of people - it doesn&#8217;t surprise me that google is jumping on. I had the experience of using google maps with the built in GPS for the first time. Cool! </p>
<p>Bob - 2.5G vs. 3G for a GSM device is easy since 3G supports CDMA whereas 2.5G just GMSK based TDMA (for voice) and the addition of EDGE with 8-PSK for data. </p>
<p>Steve - We get a new G about every 10 years. So you are about right, something like 25G would be appropriate. Not sure it is incremental. System spectral efficiency is certainly increasing by more than 4% - which is the real sell to service providers. For us though, 2G voice versus 3G voice, honestly can&#8217;t tell the difference. The data rate is higher though.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Steven Peters</title>
		<link>http://windowsil.org/2007/10/11/3g-is-finally-here/#comment-19726</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 01:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://windowsil.org/2007/10/11/3g-is-finally-here/#comment-19726</guid>
					<description>Each G gets more and more incremental.  200 years from now, will they be celebrating 26G wireless communications?  

&quot;Now with 4% more G!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Each G gets more and more incremental.  200 years from now, will they be celebrating 26G wireless communications?  </p>
<p>&#8220;Now with 4% more G!&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bob Daniels</title>
		<link>http://windowsil.org/2007/10/11/3g-is-finally-here/#comment-19702</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://windowsil.org/2007/10/11/3g-is-finally-here/#comment-19702</guid>
					<description>BTW, it appears that the manufacturer of your 3G phone &lt;a href=http://www.dailywireless.org/2007/10/10/gphone-rumors/ rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;is helping google make their &quot;GPhone&quot;&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, it appears that the manufacturer of your 3G phone <a href=http://www.dailywireless.org/2007/10/10/gphone-rumors/ rel="nofollow">is helping google make their &#8220;GPhone&#8221;</a>.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bob Daniels</title>
		<link>http://windowsil.org/2007/10/11/3g-is-finally-here/#comment-19701</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://windowsil.org/2007/10/11/3g-is-finally-here/#comment-19701</guid>
					<description>What distinguishes a 3G device from a 2.5G device?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What distinguishes a 3G device from a 2.5G device?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

