<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Future Wireless with Nano</title>
	<link>http://windowsil.org/2007/10/19/future-wireless-with-nano/</link>
	<description>Your window into the Wireless Systems Innovation Laboratory</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 13:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Bob Daniels</title>
		<link>http://windowsil.org/2007/10/19/future-wireless-with-nano/#comment-20560</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 19:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://windowsil.org/2007/10/19/future-wireless-with-nano/#comment-20560</guid>
					<description>I find this topic fascinating, but I must admit I don't really understand why this motivates analog signal processing?  Won't carbon nanotubes enable high-speed, power-conservative digital circuits?  If they ever find a cheap manufacturing process for VLSI carbon nanotube circuits, watch out.  I do agree, however, that Moore's law can't go on forever...or can it?  At some point, assuming the demands on processing scale, analog circuits will be required to perform the function of traditionally digital circuits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this topic fascinating, but I must admit I don&#8217;t really understand why this motivates analog signal processing?  Won&#8217;t carbon nanotubes enable high-speed, power-conservative digital circuits?  If they ever find a cheap manufacturing process for VLSI carbon nanotube circuits, watch out.  I do agree, however, that Moore&#8217;s law can&#8217;t go on forever&#8230;or can it?  At some point, assuming the demands on processing scale, analog circuits will be required to perform the function of traditionally digital circuits.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

