<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Goes Mobile</title>
	<link>http://windowsil.org/2007/11/12/google-goes-mobile/</link>
	<description>Your window into the Wireless Systems Innovation Laboratory</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 13:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Steven Peters</title>
		<link>http://windowsil.org/2007/11/12/google-goes-mobile/#comment-22777</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://windowsil.org/2007/11/12/google-goes-mobile/#comment-22777</guid>
					<description>Bob,

I'm not saying it's bad, just posing some hypothetical questions really.

And at this point, Google could pretty much do whatever they want and get publicity with it. When there's so much hype around something (anything Google now), I just tend to dismiss it until someone shows me exactly why it's great.  Hype just turns me off.  On that level, Google is akin to Harry Potter or Lindsay Lohan.  

...unless they want to fund my PhD, in which case, I'll put on my Google shirt and hat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying it&#8217;s bad, just posing some hypothetical questions really.</p>
<p>And at this point, Google could pretty much do whatever they want and get publicity with it. When there&#8217;s so much hype around something (anything Google now), I just tend to dismiss it until someone shows me exactly why it&#8217;s great.  Hype just turns me off.  On that level, Google is akin to Harry Potter or Lindsay Lohan.  </p>
<p>&#8230;unless they want to fund my PhD, in which case, I&#8217;ll put on my Google shirt and hat.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bob Daniels</title>
		<link>http://windowsil.org/2007/11/12/google-goes-mobile/#comment-22362</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 13:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://windowsil.org/2007/11/12/google-goes-mobile/#comment-22362</guid>
					<description>Steve, your Apple comment really only applies to the iPhone.  In the past many people have complained that Apple didn't make their computers upgradeable.  I always thought they were doing us a favor...you'll never have incompatibility issues with an Apple computer.  Sure you'll pay a price premium, but many people are willing to for a superior product.  It'd be nice if Mac OS X was open source, but at least it has a Unix core so you can do a lot more software development than with Windows.  When Apple signed this exclusive deal with AT&amp;T, I was a bit upset.  I don't think Apple wants to continue down that path or many of their customers will be unhappy.  It won't take much for me to be exclusively a Linux user, and I think many Mac users are the same.  

As for Google, I like everything this company has done so far.  I'm pretty sure most of their employees are fat and happy.  It sounds like a good plan to me.  Why pay for a bunch of new employees to work on mobile software which has no defined direction when you can hold a contest and see what the tide brings in.  Look at how much publicity they are getting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, your Apple comment really only applies to the iPhone.  In the past many people have complained that Apple didn&#8217;t make their computers upgradeable.  I always thought they were doing us a favor&#8230;you&#8217;ll never have incompatibility issues with an Apple computer.  Sure you&#8217;ll pay a price premium, but many people are willing to for a superior product.  It&#8217;d be nice if Mac OS X was open source, but at least it has a Unix core so you can do a lot more software development than with Windows.  When Apple signed this exclusive deal with AT&#038;T, I was a bit upset.  I don&#8217;t think Apple wants to continue down that path or many of their customers will be unhappy.  It won&#8217;t take much for me to be exclusively a Linux user, and I think many Mac users are the same.  </p>
<p>As for Google, I like everything this company has done so far.  I&#8217;m pretty sure most of their employees are fat and happy.  It sounds like a good plan to me.  Why pay for a bunch of new employees to work on mobile software which has no defined direction when you can hold a contest and see what the tide brings in.  Look at how much publicity they are getting.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Steven Peters</title>
		<link>http://windowsil.org/2007/11/12/google-goes-mobile/#comment-22324</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 03:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://windowsil.org/2007/11/12/google-goes-mobile/#comment-22324</guid>
					<description>There is so much hype about everything Google that it's hard for me to see what exactly they're doing.  I wonder how their employees feel about, effectively, outsourcing their software development for this, or if they're eligible to participate in the challenge.  

Things like this are why I'm not a fan of Apple anything; they will never let this software on their phones.  Apple makes a good product and then gets upset if you try to modify it to your liking.  Not very engineer-friendly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is so much hype about everything Google that it&#8217;s hard for me to see what exactly they&#8217;re doing.  I wonder how their employees feel about, effectively, outsourcing their software development for this, or if they&#8217;re eligible to participate in the challenge.  </p>
<p>Things like this are why I&#8217;m not a fan of Apple anything; they will never let this software on their phones.  Apple makes a good product and then gets upset if you try to modify it to your liking.  Not very engineer-friendly.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

