<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Write a good paper or file a good patent? Or both?</title>
	<link>http://windowsil.org/2008/02/07/write-a-good-paper-or-file-a-good-patent-or-both/</link>
	<description>Your window into the Wireless Systems Innovation Laboratory</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 13:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Insoo Hwang</title>
		<link>http://windowsil.org/2008/02/07/write-a-good-paper-or-file-a-good-patent-or-both/#comment-30032</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://windowsil.org/2008/02/07/write-a-good-paper-or-file-a-good-patent-or-both/#comment-30032</guid>
					<description>Professor, I think you pointed out the biggest problem when filing a patent. Inventors (like us) first explain about the invention to a legal counsel first, then lawyers make a draft of claims, and finally inventors revise them. But lawyers are not knowledgeable on the technology like us, whereas we are unfamiliar with making broad claims without infringing existing claims. I think this is why some novel papers in academia weren't filed as patents, and consequently didn't make huge money.

I think a good system engineer should be able to write a good paper and file a good patent. Usually the leader of standard team in a company knows both very well. But as a grad student, to do both is really hard.. therefore it's cool if there's a patent lawyer in WNCG to help us filing our ideas as patents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Professor, I think you pointed out the biggest problem when filing a patent. Inventors (like us) first explain about the invention to a legal counsel first, then lawyers make a draft of claims, and finally inventors revise them. But lawyers are not knowledgeable on the technology like us, whereas we are unfamiliar with making broad claims without infringing existing claims. I think this is why some novel papers in academia weren&#8217;t filed as patents, and consequently didn&#8217;t make huge money.</p>
<p>I think a good system engineer should be able to write a good paper and file a good patent. Usually the leader of standard team in a company knows both very well. But as a grad student, to do both is really hard.. therefore it&#8217;s cool if there&#8217;s a patent lawyer in WNCG to help us filing our ideas as patents.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Robert Heath</title>
		<link>http://windowsil.org/2008/02/07/write-a-good-paper-or-file-a-good-patent-or-both/#comment-30002</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://windowsil.org/2008/02/07/write-a-good-paper-or-file-a-good-patent-or-both/#comment-30002</guid>
					<description>Insoo, interesting article. One question I have is who writes the claims? Most of the patents I have co-invented, a legal counsel formulated the claims and we revised them. Are you advocating for the inventors to write the claims? Or are you advocating for good lawyers to write the claims? I feel that engineers may have a hard time making really broad claims while lawyers may not understand the technology enough to write those claims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Insoo, interesting article. One question I have is who writes the claims? Most of the patents I have co-invented, a legal counsel formulated the claims and we revised them. Are you advocating for the inventors to write the claims? Or are you advocating for good lawyers to write the claims? I feel that engineers may have a hard time making really broad claims while lawyers may not understand the technology enough to write those claims.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

